Federal Court: California Handgun Roster Does Not Violate Second Amendment Rights

U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller has ruled the California Handgun Roster to be constitutional.

California Handgun Roster
Photo by Wikimedia Commons

The following press release was issued by The Calguns Foundation

In response to a federal district court decision released today on the constitutionality of the State of California’s “Unsafe Handgun Act” handgun roster and microstamping laws, The Calguns Foundation released the following statement:

“We are disappointed that the district court sidestepped a clear violation of Second Amendment civil rights in its decision today. However, we are absolutely committed to litigating this case as far as necessary to reverse this incorrect ruling and restore the right to keep and bear modern handguns in the Golden State.

It is difficult to understand how the Supreme Court’s landmark District of Columbia v. Heller decision could be so badly mis-applied. Laws that ban law-abiding people from acquiring virtually all modern handguns following a rigorous background check have no constitutional basis and must be overturned.

It is utterly preposterous that a Federal Court would rule that a ban on all new semi-automatic handguns does not burden Second Amendment rights. Such a decision conflicts with Ninth Circuit precedent, much less the Supreme Court’s holdings in Heller and McDonald v. Chicago.

Our counsel have already appealed the ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and will take every action necessary to create a successful outcome there.”

Case information, including today’s decision, can be viewed at https://www.calgunsfoundation.org/litigation/pena-v-lindley.

Information on the Unsafe Handgun Act, California’s handgun roster, and microstamping law can be viewed at https://www.calgunsfoundation.org/roster.

The Calguns Foundation (www.calgunsfoundation.org) is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that serves its members, supporters, and the public through educational, cultural, and judicial efforts to advance Second Amendment and related civil rights.

Show Comments