The chronograph is an important tool for the handloader. In fact, I consider it be a must-have accessory. However, it is not the end-all, be-all answer to developing an accurate handload. Some folks believe that by using a chronograph they can determine which loads have the best accuracy potential. While it is true that ammunition with consistent velocities often shoot tight groups, one is not a definite indicator of the other.
I tested a rifle with three loads assembled with the same brass, primer and powder to the same overall length. The only difference between the loads was that they were topped off with a different 100-grain bullet. Three groups—one 4-shot group and two 3-shot groups—were fired with each load, and group sizes were averaged. Every shot was fired over a chronograph to establish an average velocity, maximum velocity deviation and standard velocity deviation.
The most accurate load had the highest velocity as well as the largest velocity deviation and standard deviation. The load with the lowest velocity deviations—which were half that of the most accurate load—displayed almost identical accuracy. For all practical purposes, at 100 yards these loads were identical on paper.
Things change as the shooting distance increases. Given the velocities and the bullets I was using, at 500 yards a velocity variation of 108 fps will drastically increase group size. For example, a velocity reduction of 108 fps with the first load will result in an additional 11 inches of drop. However, with the first load, a velocity reduction of 57 fps will only induce about 6 inches of drop at distance.
Interestingly, the bullet used in the first load has a higher ballistic coefficient. As this test shows, when your shooting distances get long, you need truly consistent velocities to create small groups on target.
Doug Koenig heads to Northern Florida with his two sons for Osceola Wild Turkey; then...
by Personal Defense World / Jan 14, 2016